Current testing scope
This page deliberately lists only the areas currently represented in testing. It is a scope statement—not a claim that Diagnify is validated, authorised or fit for independent clinical use in either specialty.
Listed areas
Each area presents different reasoning, evidence and safety challenges. Results in one context must not be assumed to transfer to another.
Status: currently in testing.
The evaluation focus is structured support for undifferentiated presentations: problem representation, red-flag review, differential construction and questions that may clarify the next clinical step.
Status: currently in testing.
The evaluation focus is structured organisation of developmental and behavioural information, including context, functional impact, alternative explanations and questions that require clinician verification.
Interpreting scope
A responsible specialty claim needs evidence that reflects the target population, clinical setting, intended users and real workflow. It also needs clear failure analysis, subgroup assessment and prospective monitoring.
Use during evaluation
Check that the case and task fall within the approved local evaluation scope.
Compare suggestions with the history, examination, authoritative evidence and local guidance.
Capture omissions, irrelevant suggestions, bias concerns and unsafe outputs for evaluation.
The clinician remains responsible for assessment, escalation, investigation and management.
Related information
Transparent scope
New areas will be listed only when there is a genuine evaluation scope to describe.
